Blogging with two balls

White Pube-ism

I used to be an angry kid, I used to think I could take on the whole world, I used to think I wanted to. I used to feel so resentful. I used to get so upset when people glanced past me, people who didn’t bother to get to know me. I used to get so upset, I used to feel so uncomfortable. I used to want to show them all. I used to resent people who had money and flaunted it, I used to resent collectors, I used to resent money in itself, I used to feel so fragile and I used to be amped up with some weirdo adrenaline of juggling both a superiority and an inferiority complex at the same time. I used to angrily question the whole thing and it used to all feel so empty to me, so superficial, so confusing and alienating.

There is this particular kind of institutional critique popularised by art world-adjacent early Zoomers/late millennials like The White Pube in particular, and art world meme pages like Jerry Gogosian and Freeze Magazine. We can probably also throw Diet Prada’s vibe into the mix. The White Pube is Gabrielle de la Puente and Zarina Muhammad, a pair of critics from Liverpool and London respectively, who began The White Pube website with the intention of posting reviews and criticism of exhibitions around the UK, but have since branched out to also cover movies, tv shows, video games, and more. They are also internationally renowned, having been invited to speak and conduct art criticism workshops at different institutions all around the world. Their art criticism (on both their website and their Instagram) tends to have this devil-may-care attitude to it that’s very infectious.

The White Pube are also known for name-tagging all the artists, galleries, curators, and spaces whose exhibitions or works they review. They take pride in having built up their platform and following through sheer verve, hard work, and directed name-tagging, without having ever resorted to spammy hashtags. There is something I can respect in that.

The flippant, jokey tone adopted by The White Pube and their imitators (the lingua franca of memes and onlineness) allows the critic to sidestep the responsibility that comes with being taken seriously, yet by mere virtue of critiquing (as opposed to just being silent or giving a false opinion), they are demanding to be taken seriously. This style of call-out critique follows a Marxist tendency to view society—in this case, the microcosm of a locale’s “art world”—as divided up and categorised into roles and jobs, which are extrapolated into “classes”. It makes assumptions of the bank accounts and spending power of random figures (how rich and powerful they are) based off first impressions and gossip. They confuse job positions for financial power, assuming that anyone in a high-ranking position necessarily has easy access to money or, conversely, that an intern or other low-ranking position is necessarily subordinate and therefore oppressed. They also don’t seem very inclined to see themselves as ACTIVE players capable of developing their own INFLUENCE within their particular group / microcosm. It’s difficult for them to conceive of manifesting power for their own self. In short, they are bitter.

The White Pube style of criticism is perhaps easily imitable, but difficult to do well. It’s easy to copy because anyone “in the scene” with an ounce of bitterness within them towards “the scene” can believe that their bitterness is justified, that simply feeling oppressed is proof enough of material oppression. Once you already believe this, all you need to do is make a post that’s as funny and simple-minded as a fart joke, tag the artist/gallery/curator you’re talking about, and wait back as (you hope) people applaud you for your ballsiness, for using your personal page to express ~what everyone is thinking but nobody is saying~

Now here’s the thing. The White Pube has been hugely influential on my own earliest “art writing” and the way I understand my own position within my local art scene. Both of them were and still are good critics and good writers generally. (Caveat: I haven’t been following their reviews for over a year now.) In many of my past writings, I still thought that, in order to really stand out, I had to go straight for the jugular and pull it all off in a funny, arrogant, Kanye at the VMAs manner. But this is not what The White Pube do, or perhaps it’s what they sometimes did but have matured from. Not everyone who attempts to make art world jokes are always able to pull it off with the same grace.  The White Pube writes even-minded, critical and thoughtful reviews. Some people, some imitators, like my earlier self, think that all it takes is the attitude, as if being ballsy and chaotic enough to say the first thought in your brain is a virtue in and of itself. 

Jasper Johns, Painting with Two Balls (1960).

The people who ride on the coattails of Instagram meme page White Pube-style criticism underestimate their own existence in the world; they minimise their own selves without anyone forcing them to. I used to be so bitter when I first started out, but what I think now is this: the things you say and do and put out into the world still exist, they still take place, no matter how small you think you are. No matter how much the writers of The White Pube may underestimate their own positions within the UK art world, they still wield massive influence. And even if they were smaller — even if they were, say, individuals simply posting rants and tedious self-made memes, for example, on their own Instagram stories, as a hypothetical1 — they’re still emitting energies and thoughts out into the world. They are engaging with society’s fabric.

And I find it preposterous that I even need to say the following because it’s so obvious, but here goes: the contexts of The White Pube (based in an art world capital of a first world country that up until the last century was a global empire) and some struggling art non-scene in a backwater third-world country like Malaysia are totally, totally, utterly different.

(Bitch, what are you even talking about — elitism and wealth in the Malaysian art world?

Have you even seen any of our collectors lately? I say this with much affection but, they’re all just a bunch of old dudes who would rather be farmers or gardeners instead!

These are the people you’re so scared of???? These are the people whose condescension (most likely just a case of old age and blur-ness) has wounded you so deeply?????? Like… just leave the conversation then??? Like??)

I find that my perspective on things shifts the longer I work in the scene. Just like how this no-holds-barred supreme bitch attitude felt like it could propel me through anything when I was younger (I had no other spiritual brick to anchor me then), I’ve arrived at a rather consoling realisation that an attitude of confidence can also guide you through anything. The older I get, the more layers of not-giving-a-fuck I unlock, and it feels beatific, zen-like. 

I don’t resent money anymore because I started making more of it. It’s the typical story, but typical only because it happens to more people than you might think. And I may continue to be in subordinate positions, but I respect self-respect and self-starters. I no longer care how much an artwork is, and I no longer care who buys it except in a very superficial sense in how it relates to my job, I hardly care either about the particulars of which artist, gallery, or collector has started venturing into NFTs, and I no longer care about being looked down upon, because if someone ignores me then that’s just another tedious conversation avoided. 

I enjoy working. I like to labour. There is a meme widely shared on Verso-adjacent Marxist meme pages that goes, “I do not have a dream job. I do not dream of labour.” But actually, I do. Against the expectations of many of my generation and against my younger self, I do Dream of Labour. Service gives me a strong sense of purpose and the satisfaction of new, previously unknown levels of self-sacrifice. I still find getting older a little scary, but the fear is moderated by the exhilaration of shedding off so much more nervous angst and discovering newer ways that I can be useful and transcendent to other people. At the risk of sounding like a total retard, there’s a scene in the third episode of jeen-yuhs, the Kanye West documentary, where Kanye expresses his desire to make things ‘for the masses’. He says, and I rewound the documentary just to find this, 

“I’m definitely straight, I’m straighter than straight. I’m good, like I’ve lived a thousand lifetimes, you know? I wanna make sure that everybody is straight. I’m not gonna be completely happy and completely satisfied until the world is completely satisfied. […] How can we take this and give this to the masses? If everyone is focused on helping everyone, everybody’s gonna be in a better position.”

Celebrities and artists always make empty talk about doing things “for the people”, but when Ye says it I believe deeply and truly in the sentiment. I contain and am emissary for this new desire to serve others, in practical terms, but also in personal, symbolic ones. I want to be the best version of myself that I can be, for other people: collective transcendence through personal struggle with one’s self. I’m talking in tongues, but I believe in it. 

What I would like to ask people who are so angry at the art world — to whom, even, the concept of an “art world” appears to mean so much to the point of oppression — is this: have you ever tried not caring?

By quite simply not caring, you can make just about anything disappear. It sounds caustic but it’s true. I used to care so much, but when I realised that I could simply just not care about the things I used to get so worked up over, then many of these things simply ceased to exist in my universe. It’s an elite level of manifestation and personal world-building.

Finally, I believe that The White Pube model of critique doesn’t work in Malaysia because we barely have an art scene or art market to begin with. I’m sorry, but many of the things that happen in the local art world are just too insignificant to merit any comment, let alone criticism. Most of the time, the people who are angriest and most bitter over collectors and “scene politics” come from money themselves, and they resent the fact that their gilded education and bank accounts haven’t been able to get them anywhere they can be proud of. Based on the little they share about their personal lives, the writers of The White Pube both seem to be working-class people operating in a ruthless, impenetrable, high-level art industry of a world capital. I (sometimes) get why they might be angry, but I don’t get why anyone would be angry in Malaysia. I understand TWP when they express their desire to see more artists being taken seriously and not having to prostrate themselves to inane open calls and whack-ass behaviour from curators and gallerists. But when it comes to Malaysia, the cold hard fact is that there’s no money in the art world. Most people survive on grants, external funding, and The Bank of Mommy and Daddy. The coldness of this fact reduces money’s lustre in the art world; flaunting money fails to be impressive, and the people who do it are pitiable but not worthy of the effort of hatred. No matter how much wealth you have, it’s not enough to really get you out of these backwaters, because willpower is often as important a factor in that regard as money. Many of our local collectors are stuck in the cul-de-sac of buying the same things and the same artists over and over again, so you shouldn’t be mad at them for they know not what they do. There is only so far that you can go in the Malaysian art world, and only so much money, so it’s inane to apply White Pube models of critique to anything that happens in this sweaty little struggling scene.

I continue to work in the art world because the professional relationships are good and relaxed. I love artists with all of my all of my allllll of my heart. There are some good works being made, some wild dreams being dreamt, though I rest uneasily wondering if they’ll go anywhere — not through the fault of the artists, but the limits of our context. I also find many of the people I meet to be charming and charismatic, on top of being creative. The professional relationships I’ve developed over time have given me strong proof that such things as charm and charisma do exist, they do work, and they fill me with more joy than money. 

By fixing your attitude, you really, truly can get the recognition and respect that you’re making yourself so miserable with wanting.

And on that note, following on from charm and charisma, the final, final thing I want to say about the White Pube/Instagram meme model of critique is: it only works if you’re actually funny

You may think having the balls to call someone out by name on Instagram is funny in itself, but it’s not. With a little less than all the due respect, you are just not a funny person. I be cringing, bro. 


1you know who you are. 

One thought on “Blogging with two balls

  1. I must say you’ve made some very astute observations about our backwater art scene in this post. Ours is one that has great potential but continues to flounder, among other reasons, because those who can actually make a difference don’t have a clue and continuously do things for all the wrong reasons.

    I would also add that way too many players in the scene think too highly of it, showering more “praise” and adulation than it deserves. I believe the Malay phrase for it would be “syiok sendiri”… 😉

    Enjoying your writing so far, and hope to read much more!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s